Jewel Tea Co., Inc.
v.
City of Camden.
v.
City of Camden.
Jan 9, 1934.
Mr. L.A. Wittkowsky , for appellant, cites: As to intrastate shipment: 55 F.2d 347 ; 187 U.S. 622 ; 233 U.S. 334 ; 5 R.C.L., 713; 204 U.S. 403 ; 51 L.Ed., 540 ; 244 U.S. 346 ; 61 L.Ed., 1181 ; 260 U.S. 166 ; 12 F.2d 541 ; 29 L.R.A. (N.S.), 745; 38 S.C. 365 ; 37 A.S.R., 767; 17 S.E., 147; 122 Ga. 365 ; 50 S.E., 132 ; 61 A., 695 . Reasonable ordinance: 48 S.C. 570 ; 125 S.C. 530 .
Mr. Murdoch M. Johnson , for respondent, cites: Interstate shipment: 12 C.J., 38; 12 C.J., 107; 120 U.S. 489 ; 187 U.S. 622 ; 227 U.S. 389 ; 227 U.S. 401 . Interstate .
Stabrer, Brease, Messrs, Carter, Bonham.
profession or occupation in whole or in part within the limits of the City of Camden
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
For the reasons stated by his Honor, Judge Dennis, in his decree, which will be reported, the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.