Lilienthal v. South Carolina Pub. Serv. Co., 177 S.E. 98 (1934).
Lilienthal v. South Carolina Pub. Serv. Co., 177 S.E. 98 (1934). Book View Copy Cite
Lilienthal
v.
South Carolina Public Service Co. and Six Other Cases.
Messrs. Shimel Rittenberg , for appellants, cite: Damages: 8 R.C.L., 459; 83 S.C. 501 ; 65 S.E., 638 ; 91 S.C. 417 ; 74 S.E., 1067 ; 78 S.C. 327 ; 58 S.E., 1013 ; 151 S.C. 484 ; 149 S.E., 246 ; 17 C.J., 746; 106 S.W. 292; 214 Mass. 552 ; 97 S.W. 621; 266 F., 688; 161 S.C. 540 ;. Messrs. Hagood, Rivers Young , for respondent, cite: Damages for breach of contract : 166 S.E., 350; 70 S.C. 108 ; 166 S.C. 454 ; 165 S.E., 203 ; 169 S.C. 384 ; 169 S.E., 78 ; 169 S.E., 433; 70 S.C. 8 ; 83 S.C. 503 ; 91 S.C. 417 ; 78 S.C. 327 ; 157 S.C. 484 ; 214 Mass. 552 ; 32 Ky., 531 .
Stabler, Messrs, Carter, Bonham, Graydon.
having falsely and fraudulently represented to the plaintiff that the aforesaid securities constituted a first mortgage on the plant of the defendant

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Stabler.

For the reasons stated by his Honor, Judge Sease, in his order, which will be reported, the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Carter and Bonham concur. Mr. Acting Associate Justice C. T. Graydon did not participate.