Michael Anguille v. State of Florida (Fla. 4th DCA 2018). · Go Syfert
Michael Anguille v. State of Florida (Fla. 4th DCA 2018). Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michael Anguille
v.
State of Florida
16-3964.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Mar 21, 2018.
Published
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT

MICHAEL VINCENT ANGUILLE,
Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.

No. 4D16-3964

[March 21, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Lisa M. Porter, Judge; L.T. Case No. 14-004710-CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Gary Lee Caldwell, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mark J. Hamel, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM. On appeal, appellant argues that the trial court erred by imposing: (1) a sentence for misdemeanor possession of cannabis in excess of the statutory maximum; (2) court costs for that offense under section 938.05(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2017), after imposing costs under the same statutory provision for a companion felony charge in the case; and (3) costs under section 318.18, Florida Statutes (2017), when no traffic offense was charged in the case. Appellee confesses error, and does not oppose reversal of the sentence on the cannabis charge and reversal of the order imposing the contested costs. After reviewing the record, we agree that the trial court erred. We reverse the sentence and contested costs imposed by the trial court for the cannabis charge and remand for further proceedings. Reversed and remanded. CIKLIN, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

[*2]