McNeil v. State, 163 So. 3d 661 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).
Search
McNeil v. State, 163 So. 3d 661 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015). Book View Copy Cite
Brenton McNEIL
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 5D13-1810.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Apr 24, 2015.
163 So. 3d 661
Michael R. Ufferman, of Michael Uffer-man Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant., Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and L. Charlene Matthews, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
Orfinger, Palmer, Sawaya.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

ON MOTION TO CERTIFY QUESTION

ORFINGER, J.

Following the issuance of our opinion in this case, Appellant, Brenton McNeil, moved for certification of a question of [*662] great public importance. We grant the motion and certify the following question to the Florida Supreme Court in accordance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v) as one of great public importance:

ARE THE COSTS IMPOSED PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 938.085, 938.08, AND 938.10, FLORIDA STATUTES (2006), ASSESSED “PER CASE” OR “PER COUNT”?

QUESTION CERTIFIED.

SAWAYA and PALMER, JJ., concur.