green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
18.9 score
“in order to qualify for removal of the registration requirement, appellant had to establish he was 'not more than 4 years older than the victim' pursuant to section 943.04354(l)(c), florida statutes.”
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
State v. Caragol
in order to qualify for removal of the registration requirement, appellant had to establish he was 'not more than 4 years older than the victim' pursuant to section 943.04354(l)(c), florida statutes.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Henry Bernard VANN
v.
STATE of Florida
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 1D11-5978.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct 31, 2012.
Lisa A. Anderson, Panama City, for Appellant., Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Marstiller, Padovano, Swanson.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: District Court of Appeal of Fl… (1)
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks review of the trial court’s denial of his motion for removal of the sexual offender registration requirement. In order to qualify for removal of the registration requirement, appellant had to establish he was “not more than 4 years older than the victim” pursuant to section 943.04354(l)(c), Florida Statutes. Consistent with the prior decisions of our sister courts construing the plain language of the statute, we conclude the trial court properly denied appellant’s motion because appellant was four years, three months, and ten days older than the victim. See State v. Welch, 94 So.3d 631 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012); State v. Samuels, 76 So.3d 1109 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011); State v. Marcel, 67 So.3d 1223 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).
AFFIRMED.
PADOVANO, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.2