Mizell Live Stock Co. v. Pollard, 71 So. 31 (Fla. 1916).
Mizell Live Stock Co. v. Pollard, 71 So. 31 (Fla. 1916). Book View Copy Cite
Mizell Live Stock Company, a Corporation, in Error
v.
Garrison A. Pollard, in Error
Supreme Court of Florida.
Feb 15, 1916.
71 So. 31
W. J. Oven, for Plaintiff in Error;, Fred T. Myers, for Defendant in Error.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

This is a writ of error directed to the granting of a new trial.

The motion for a new trial contained several grounds which questioned the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and also claimed newly discovered evidence. The trial Judge simply granted the motion without specifying the ground upon which his order was based. We have examined the transcript of the record and are of the opinion that the order must be affirmed upon the authority of Ruff v. Georgia Southern & Florida Ry. Co., 67 Fla. 224, 64 South. Rep. 782, and Chancey v. Williams, 56 Fla. 215, 47 South. Rep. 811.

Order affirmed.