Michael Anthony Kliebert v. The Upjohn Co., 923 F.2d 47 (5th Cir. 1991).
Search
Michael Anthony Kliebert v. The Upjohn Co., 923 F.2d 47 (5th Cir. 1991). Book View Copy Cite
⚠ Negative Treatment Vacated 1 negative ▼
Michael Anthony KLIEBERT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
the UPJOHN COMPANY, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
89-3406.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jan 22, 1991.
923 F.2d 47
C. John Caskey, Baton Rouge, La., for plaintiff-appellant., John J. Weigel and Vivian L. Madison, Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carr-ere & Denegre, New Orleans, La., for Upjohn Co., Kathleen A. Manning and Henri Wol-brette, III, McGlinchey, Stafford, Cellini & Lang, New Orleans, La., for Pfizer, Inc., Wm. F. Bologna, Habans & Bologna, New Orleans, La., for American Cyanamid Co., etc., Joseph P. Gordon, Jr., Phillip C. Rouse, and Henry A. Alsobrook, Jr., Adams & Reese, New Orleans, La., for Bristol-Myers Co. and E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.
Clark, Gee, Politz, King, Johnson, Garwood, Jolly, Higginbotham, Davis, Jones, Smith, Duhé, Wiener, Barksdale.
Cited by 8 opinions  |  Published
BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.