Vinlis Constr. Co. v. Roreck, 320 N.E.2d 277 (N.Y. 1974). · Go Syfert
Vinlis Constr. Co. v. Roreck, 320 N.E.2d 277 (N.Y. 1974). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events across 8 distinct courts.
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Vinlis Construction Co., Inc.
v.
John J. Roreck
New York Court of Appeals.
Oct 11, 1974.
Published opinion
320 N.E.2d 277
1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1281
Benjamin Cooper for motion., Arthur A. Kaye and William H. George opposed.
Cited by 14 opinions  |  Published

Motion, insofar as leave is sought to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order as affirmed the denial of plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, dismissed upon the ground[*716] that said portion of the Appellate Division order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Motion, insofar as leave is sought to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order as affirmed the dismissal of the complaint as against defendants Auslander and Public Service Heat and Power Co., Inc. denied.