Van Gorder v. Masterplanned, Inc., 78 N.Y.2d 1106 (NY 1991).
Search
Van Gorder v. Masterplanned, Inc., 78 N.Y.2d 1106 (NY 1991). Book View Copy Cite
Anita Van Gorder
v.
Masterplanned, Incorporated, Formerly Known as Muttontown Holding Corp.
New York Court of Appeals.
Nov 25, 1991.
78 N.Y.2d 1106
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Elliot Paskoff, Avrom E. Greenberg and Francis J. Hearn, Jr., for appellant., Jerry A. Weiss for respondents.
Cited by 27 opinions  |  Published

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment denied.

Inasmuch as a triable issue of fact exists as to whether plaintiffs, who claim to have acquired title to defendant’s property by adverse possession, acknowledged during the stat [*1108] utory 10-year period that actual ownership of the property rested with defendant, summary judgment should not have been awarded to plaintiffs. Such a concession, if found by the trier of fact to exist, would negate an essential element of plaintiffs’ adverse possession claim, namely, that they continued to possess the property under a claim of right throughout the statutory period (see, City of Tonawanda v Ellicott Cr. Homeowners Assn., 86 AD2d 118, 123; see also, Van Valkenburgh v Lutz, 304 NY 95, 99).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.