Little
v.
Wirth
v.
Wirth
The Superior Court of New York City.
Dec 15, 1893.
Joseph H. Fargis, for plaintiff (appellant)., Welch & Daniels (George S. Daniels, of counsel), for defendant (respondent).
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
The judgment appealed from was entered in due conformity with the order sustaining the demurrer, and the notice of appeal does not ask for a review of the order. But independently of that the judgment is right upon the merits, [*302] and should be affirmed upon the opinion rendered by the learned judge below.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.