J. W. C. Seavey & others
v.
Daniel Potter
v.
Daniel Potter
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.
Nov 14, 1876.
I). Q. Linscott, for the plaintiffs., 8. B. Ives, Jr. W. 0. Fabens, for the defendant.
Cited by 8 opinions | Published
The claim of the plaintiff to rescind the sale is wholly inconsistent with his proof in bankruptcy of a promissory note taken for the price of the goods. Ormsby v. Dearborn, 116 Mass. 386. See also Bassett v. Brown, 105 Mass. 551. Exceptions overruled.