United States v. Gerald Wayne Sturgill, 25 F.3d 1042 (4th Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Gerald Wayne Sturgill, 25 F.3d 1042 (4th Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
50 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Sneed v. Nevada Department of Corrections (nvd, 2025-05-08)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
cited Cited "see" Sneed v. Nevada Department of Corrections
D. Nev. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See Duke Energy Trading & Mktg., L.L.C. v. Davis, 267 25 F.3d 1042 , 1049 (9th Cir. 2001).
cited Cited "see" Montgomery v. State of Nevada
D. Nev. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Martin, 226 25 F.3d 1042 , 1048 n.8 (9th Cir. 2000).
cited Cited "see" Wright v. Nash
2d Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Wright, 25 F.3d 1042 (4th Cir.1994) (unpublished table decision).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Pineda v. Sun Valley Packing, L.P.
E.D. Cal. · 2021 · signal: see also · confidence low
Nos. 19, 20.) 22 LEGAL STANDARD 23 “If at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter 24 jurisdiction, the case shall be remanded.” 28 U.S.C. § 1447 (c); see also Smith v. Mylan, Inc., 761 25 F.3d 1042 , 1044 (9th Cir. 2014); Bruns v. NCUA, 122 F.3d 1251 , 1257 (9th Cir. 1997).
United States
v.
Gerald Wayne Sturgill
93-7238.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
May 25, 1994.
25 F.3d 1042
Published

25 F.3d 1042
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Gerald Wayne STURGILL, Defendant Appellant.

No. 93-7238.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 26, 1994.
Decided May 25, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-91-25)

Gerald Wayne Sturgill, appellant pro se.

Harvey Lee Bryant, III, Asst. U.S. Atty., Norfolk, VA, for appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Sturgill, No. CR-91-25 (E.D. Va. Nov. 5, 1993). Because there are no complex or substantial issues presented in this appeal, we deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.