STATE
v.
CHAIMS
v.
CHAIMS
Oregon Supreme Court.
Jan 15, 1894.
Mr. Henry E. McGinn (Messrs. Alfred F. Sears, Jr., and Nathan D. Simon on the brief), for Appellant., Messers. George E. Chamberlain, Attorney-General, and John H. Hall (Mr. Wilson T. Hume on the brief), for the State.
Published
The alleged error upon which the defendant relies for a reversal of the judgment is a certain instruction excepted to and set out in the bill of exceptions. This instruction is a transcript of an instruction approved in State v. Newton, 44 Iowa, 45, where the defendant was indicted and convicted of a like offense. Upon the facts as presented by this record, we think the instruction was applicable, and did not invade the province of the jury. Judgment affirmed. Affirmed.