United States v. Hitchcock, 298 F.3d 1021 (9th Cir. 2002).
Search
United States v. Hitchcock, 298 F.3d 1021 (9th Cir. 2002). Book View Copy Cite
⚠ Negative Treatment Superseded 1 negative ▼
United States
v.
Mark Steven HITCHCOCK
No. 00-10251.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Mar 21, 2002.
298 F.3d 1021
Sarah Courageous, Honolulu, Hawai'i, for the defendant-appellant, Loretta Sheehan, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Honolulu, Hawai'i, for the plaintiff-appellee.
Canby, Fletcher, Paez.
Cited by 23 opinions  |  Published

ORDER

The Amended Opinion United States v. Hitchcock, 286 F.3d 1064 (9th Cir.2002), filed March 21, 2002, is amended as follows:

At 286 F.3d at 1073, amend the last two sentences in the paragraph before the "Conclusion" to read:

"Hitchcock's argument is foreclosed by Harris v. United States, - U.S. 122 S.Ct. 2406, 153 L.Ed.2d 524 (2002), and our prior precedent. It is now clear that mandatory minimums do not implicate Apprendi. Id."

The mandate shall issue forthwith.