United States v. William Joseph Kirk, 78 F.3d 160 (5th Cir. 1996).
Search
United States v. William Joseph Kirk, 78 F.3d 160 (5th Cir. 1996). Book View Copy Cite
⚠ Negative Treatment Vacated 2 negative ▼
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
William Joseph KIRK, Defendant-Appellant
94-50472.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Mar 5, 1996.
78 F.3d 160
E.G. Morris, Morris & Florey, Austin, TX, for Appellant., Mark R. Stelmaeh, Richard L. Durbin, Jr., Asst. U.S. Attys., James H. DeAtley, Acting U.S. Atty., San Antonio, TX, for Appellee.
Politz, King, Garwood, Jolly, Higginbotham, Davis, Jones, Smith, Duhé, Wiener, Barksdale, Garza, Demoss, Benavides, Stewart, Parker, Dennis.
Cited by 21 opinions  |  Published

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion November 7, 1995, 5 Cir., 1995, 70 F.3d 791)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of the court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.