Unknown, 166 F.3d 1311. · Go Syfert
Search
Unknown, 166 F.3d 1311. Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Allen v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. (alsd, 1999-06-25)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Allen v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
S.D. Ala. · 1999 · confidence medium
A motion to dismiss should be granted “ “when the movant demonstrates beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.’ ” United States v. Pemco Aeroplex, Inc., 166 F.3d 1311, 1313 (11th Cir.1999) (citations omitted). 3.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
166 F.3d 1311

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PEMCO AEROPLEX, INC., a subsidiary of Precision Standard Company, a corporation, Defendant- Appellee.

No. 97-6910.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

July 6, 1999.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (No. 97-P-1300-S); Sam C. Pointer, Jr., Judge.

(Opinion February 8, 1999, 166 F.3d 1311, 11th Cir., 1999).

Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted

in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.