Josephson v. Autry, 99 So. 2d 230 (Fla. 1957). · Go Syfert
Josephson v. Autry, 99 So. 2d 230 (Fla. 1957). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“when the owner himself by his own conduct creates the exact hardship which he alleges to exist, he certainly should not be permitted to take advantage of it”
2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ago (flaag, 1985-08-28)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Ago
Fla. Att'y Gen. · 1985 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
when the owner himself by his own conduct creates the exact hardship which he alleges to exist, he certainly should not be permitted to take advantage of it
Norton JOSEPHSON
v.
Henry AUTRY, Anthony J. Grezik, J. Kermit Coble, Hayward B. Brown and E. W. Korb, as and constituting the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Daytona Beach, Florida Carl Wetherell, as the duly qualified Building Inspector of the City of Daytona Beach, Florida The City of Daytona Beach, Florida, a Municipality organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida and Ucal W. Cunningham and Minna L. Cunningham, his wife
Supreme Court of Florida.
Dec 18, 1957.
99 So. 2d 230
Norton Josephson, Daytona Beach, in pro. per., for appellant., Anthony J. Grezik, Daytona Beach, for Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Daytona Beach., Raymond, Wilson & Karl, Daytona Beach, for Ucal W. Cunningham and Minna L. Cunningham., C. A. Vincent, Jr., Daytona Beach, for Carl W. Wetherell, Building Inspector of the City of Daytona Beach, for appellees.
Connell, Hob, Son, Terrell, Thomas, Thornal.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 71%
Citer courts: Florida Attorney General Reports (1)
PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of attorneys for appellees to affirm the judgment appealed from by interlocutory appeal pursuant to the rules of this Court and it appearing to the Court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on interlocutory appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument ;

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the inter[*231] locutory order appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the order is

Affirmed.

TERRELL, C. J., and THOMAS, HOB-SON, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.