Merrill-Stevens Dry Dock Co. v. Dozier, 310 So. 2d 434 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975).
Merrill-Stevens Dry Dock Co. v. Dozier, 310 So. 2d 434 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975). Book View Copy Cite
MERRILL-STEVENS DRY DOCK CO.
v.
Thomas DOZIER and Jacqueline Dozier d/b/a the Yacht Free Love
No. 74-1681.
District Court of Appeal of Florida.
Apr 8, 1975.
310 So. 2d 434
Edward C. Vining, Jr., and R. M. MacArthur and Richard A. Burt, Miami, for appellant., G. David Parrish and Robert H. Trach-man, Coral Gables, for appellees.
Carroll, Nathan, Pearson, Ret.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of this interlocutory appeal by the defendant, Merrill-Stevens Dry Dock Co., from a final judgment of default entered after the circuit court denied the defendant’s motion to set aside a default for failure to timely file a pleading or paper in response to the plaintiff-appel-lees’ complaint, we find there to be reversible error.

The policy of the courts of Florida in setting aside defaults in order to permit a trial on the merits is one of liberality. North Shore Hospital, Inc. v. Barber, Fla.1962, 143 So.2d 849. Therefore, the order denying the defendant’s motion to set aside default and the final judgment of default entered pursuant thereto are reversed and remanded to the trial court with directions to proceed to trial on the merits.

Reversed and remanded with directions.