Hampton v. State, 351 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977).
Search
Hampton v. State, 351 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977). Book View Copy Cite
Willie HAMPTON
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 76-924.
District Court of Appeal of Florida.
Nov 9, 1977.
351 So. 2d 1101
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Henry Prettyman, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant., Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert L. Bogen, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
Anstead, Dauksch, Letts.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Heath, 343 So.2d 13 (Fla.1977).

ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur. DAUKSCH, J., concurs specially, with opinion.

Concurrence

DAUKSCH, Judge,

concurring specially:

This appeal involves the question presented in Pace v. State, 350 So.2d 1075 (Fla. 4th DCA, Opinion filed June 24, 1977), in which I dissented. See also dissent upon denial of rehearing, Opinion filed October 11, 1977. The rule is now established that the trial court may impose the restriction discussed in Pace, supra. Therefore, I concur in the result here but do not recede from my opinion in that dissent.