Cox v. State, 506 So. 2d 53 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987).
Search
Cox v. State, 506 So. 2d 53 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987). Book View Copy Cite
Deborah COX
v.
The STATE of Florida
No. 85-2229.
District Court of Appeal of Florida.
Apr 28, 1987.
506 So. 2d 53
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and N. Joseph Durant, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Charles M. Fahlbusch, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Barkdull, Baskin, Jorgenson.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Finding that the trial court’s failure to exclude defendant’s post-Miranda statement used by the state to rebut defendant’s insanity defense falls within the prohibitions of Wainwright v. Greenfield, 474 U.S. 284, 106 S.Ct. 634, 88 L.Ed.2d 623 (1986), and State v. Burwick, 442 So.2d 944 (Fla.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 931, 104 S.Ct. 1719, 80 L.Ed.2d 191 (1983), we reverse and remand for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.