Miller Brewing Co. v. Florida Dep't of Bus. Reg., Div. of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco, 527 So. 2d 891 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). · Go Syfert
Search
Miller Brewing Co. v. Florida Dep't of Bus. Reg., Div. of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco, 527 So. 2d 891 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Reynaldo A. Diaz v. State of Florida (fladistctapp, 2015-05-27) · Strongest negative: Cazares v. State (fladistctapp, 2013-11-27)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cazares v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Ashley, 850 So.2d at 1265 ; see also Taylor v. Dugger, 527 So.2d 891, 892 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988) (“[0]nce the first sentence was vacated, the consecutive sentence must be calculated from the date it was imposed, not from the date the first sentence was vacated.” (citing Falagan v. Wainwright, 195 So.2d 562 (Fla.1967); Helton v. Mayo, 153 Fla. 616 , 15 So.2d 416 (1943))).
cited Cited "see" Reynaldo A. Diaz v. State of Florida
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Taylor v. Dugger, 527 So.2d 891 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Diaz v. State, 107 So.3d 448 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).
cited Cited "see" Diaz v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Taylor v. Dugger, 527 So.2d 891 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).
cited Cited "see" Dilbert v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Taylor v. Dugger, 527 So.2d 891 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Falagan v. Wainwright, 195 So.2d 562 (Fla.1967); Vellucci v. Cochran, 138 So.2d 510 (Fla.1962).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MILLER BREWING COMPANY
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO, and Beer Industry of Florida, Inc.
No. 88-75.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jun 22, 1988.
527 So. 2d 891
Gary R. Rutledge and Marguerite H. Davis, of Katz, Kutter, Haigler, Alderman, Eaton & Davis, P.A., Tallahassee; and Jerome I. Chapman, Douglas L. Wald and David S. Eggert, of Arnold & Porter, Washington D.C., for appellant., DuBose Ausley and James D. Beasley, of Ausley, McMullen, McGehee, Carothers and Proctor, Tallahassee, for appellee Beer Industry of Florida, Inc., Katherine Emrich, Tallahassee, for ap-pellee Florida Dept, of Business Regulation, Div. of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco.
Joanos, Smith, Zehmer.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Miller Brewing Company appeals a final order of the circuit court which found that Miller, a Wisconsin brewer, was subject to the provisions of section 563.022, Florida Statutes (1987). Before briefing was completed, however, the parties filed a joint motion to vacate and remand, showing that the 1988 Florida Legislature has amended the statutory provisions here at issue so as to render this appeal moot. Accordingly, we grant the motion and reverse and remand to the trial court with directions to dismiss the complaint as moot, Fritz v. City of Hialeah, 411 So.2d 973 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

SMITH, C.J., and JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.