Minkes v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., Bd. of Osteopathic Med. Examiners, 550 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). · Go Syfert
Search
Minkes v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., Bd. of Osteopathic Med. Examiners, 550 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest negative: State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. South Beach Pharmacy, Inc. (fladistctapp, 1994-04-12)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. South Beach Pharmacy, Inc.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1994 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Minkes v. Department of Professional Regulation, No. 89-792F (DOAH March 8, 1989) affd 550 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). .If the favorable judgment or order is affirmed (or if the review proceedings are dismissed), the appellate court’s issuance of the mandate establishes the lower tribunal’s "judgment or order [as one that] has not been reversed on appeal,” and definitively concludes “the time for seeking judicial review of the judgment or order.” In such cases, the sixty days allowed by section 57.-11 l(4)(b)2., Florida Statutes (1993), run from the date that the appellate…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jules G. MINKES, D.O.
v.
DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICAL EXAMINERS
No. 89-818.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct 24, 1989.
550 So. 2d 1175
Daniel C. Minkes, Miami Beach, for appellant., Lisa S. Nelson and Charles Tunnicliff, for appellee.
Barkdull, Jorgenson, Nesbitt.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 85%
Citer courts: S.D. Florida (1)

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. § 57.111(4)(b)(2), Fla.Stat. (1987).