Luckett v. State, 590 So. 2d 955 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
Luckett v. State, 590 So. 2d 955 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Antonio Mitchell LUCKETT
v.
The STATE of Florida
No. 91-485.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov 19, 1991.
590 So. 2d 955
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and N. Joseph Durant and Carol J.Y. Wilson, Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Joan L. Greenberg and Ivy Ginsberg Sha-nock, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.
Cope, Nesbitt, Schwartz.
Published
Pinpoint authority: bottom 25%
PER CURIAM.

There was no error or abuse of discretion in the trial court’s replacement of a juror, who apparently did not arrive at a session on time, with a duly-chosen alternate. See United States v. Makres, 598 F.2d 1072 (7th Cir.1979); United States v. Domenech, 476 F.2d 1229 (2d Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 840, 94 S.Ct. 95, 38 L.Ed.2d 77 (1973). See generally Orosz v. State, 389 So.2d 1199, 1200 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980) (“The conduct of jurors is the responsibility of the court and the court is allowed discretion in dealing with any problems that arise.”).

Affirmed.