Betty T. CHEUNG
v.
EXECUTIVE CHINA DORAL, INC., and Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
v.
EXECUTIVE CHINA DORAL, INC., and Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
No. 92-2134.
District Court of Appeal of Florida.
Apr 20, 1993.
Thomas Eugene Zamorano, Miami, for appellant., William T. Moore, Tallahassee, for appel-lees.
Cope, Nesbitt, Schwartz.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Because the appeals referee’s determination that the appellant was laid off due to lack of work was supported by competent evidence, it was unjustifiably reversed by the Unemployment Appeals Commission on the basis of its own finding that she voluntarily quit. Iglesias v. Eagle Nat’l Bank of Miami, 598 So.2d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Accordingly, the order below is reversed with directions to afford Cheung the unemployment benefits claimed.