Cramer v. Broedell Plumbing Supply, 675 So. 2d 118 (Fla. 1996).
Search
Cramer v. Broedell Plumbing Supply, 675 So. 2d 118 (Fla. 1996). Book View Copy Cite
Earl L. CRAMER
v.
BROEDELL PLUMBING SUPPLY
No. 86709.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jun 13, 1996.
675 So. 2d 118
Alex Lancaster and Amy L. Sergent of Lancaster and Eure, P.A., Sarasota, and Claire Hamner Matturro, Cairo, Georgia, for Petitioner., James G. Trope and Elizabeth J. Muller of Florida Employers Insurance Service Corporation, Sarasota, for Respondents., Edward A. Dion, General Counsel and David C. Hawkins, Senior Attorney, Tallahassee, for Intervenor, Department of Labor and Employment Security, Division of Workers’ Compensation.
Anstead, Grimes, Harding, Kogan, Overton, Shaw, Wells.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
SHAW, Justice.

We have for review Cramer v. Brodell Plumbing Co., 661 So.2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995), wherein the district court certified:

Whether section [440.15(3)(b)4.d.], Florida Statutes (1991), is subject to and comports with the requirements of Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act?

We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have already answered in the affirmative. See Barry v. Burdines, 675 So.2d 587 (Fla.1996). We approve Cramer.

It is so ordered.

KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.