Sun States Servs., Inc. v. Grasiano, 714 So. 2d 1177 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). · Go Syfert
Sun States Servs., Inc. v. Grasiano, 714 So. 2d 1177 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SUN STATES SERVICES, INC., d/b/a Always Care
v.
Helen GRASIANO and Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
No. 97-03917.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jul 31, 1998.
714 So. 2d 1177
Gregory A. Hearing and Richard L. Bradford of Thompson, Sizemore & Gonzalez, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant., William T. Moore, Tallahassee, for Appel-lee Unemployment Appeals Commission.
Campbell, Frank, Green.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 83%
Citer courts: District Court of Appeal of Fl… (1)
FRANK, Judge.

Sun States Services, Inc. appeals from the order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission upholding the referee’s determination that Helen Grasiano, the claimant, is eligible for unemployment compensation benefits. We reverse.

[*1178] Sun States argues that this ease should be remanded to the UAC for a determination of whether Grasiano, a temporary employee of Sun States who was permitted by it to refuse work, was “able and available for work” within the meaning of section 443.091(l)(e)l, Florida Statutes (1995). We agree with Sun States’ position. See Sun States Services, Inc. v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 629 So.2d 858 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). Moreover, the UAC concedes that Sun States should be permitted to seek a determination of this issue.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and GREEN, J., concur.