Jordan v. State, 720 So. 2d 1077 (Fla. 1998).
Search
Jordan v. State, 720 So. 2d 1077 (Fla. 1998). Book View Copy Cite
Kimberli JORDAN
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 92702.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct 8, 1998.
720 So. 2d 1077
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton, Assistant Public Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, for Petitioner., Robert A Butterworth, Attorney General, and Lori E. Nelson, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.
Anstead, Gan, Harding, Overton, Pariente, Shaw, Wells.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Lead Opinion

SHAW, Judge.

We have for review Jordan v. State, 707 So.2d 816 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), wherein the district court cited for support Mays v. State, 693 So.2d 52 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), which was pending in this Court. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We have since approved the district court decision in Mays. See Mays v. State, 717 So.2d 515 (Fla.1998) (holding that under section 921.001(5), Florida Statutes (1995), if the “true” recommended guidelines sentence exceeds the statutory maximum, the guidelines sentence must be imposed). Accordingly, we approve the result in Jordan on this issue.[1]

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and OVERTON and WELLS, JJ., concur. PARIENTE, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with an opinion, in which KO-GAN and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
1

We decline to address the other issues raised by Jordan since they were not the basis for our review.

Concurrence in Part

PARIENTE, Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur in part and dissent in part for the reasons stated in my opinion in Mays v. State, 717 So.2d 515, 516-19 (Fla.1998) (Par-iente, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part).

KOGAN and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.