Gustavo GUTIERREZ-CHAVEZ, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE; Et Al., Respondents-Appellees
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE; Et Al., Respondents-Appellees
00-56149.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jul 22, 2003.
Victor D. Nieblas (argued), Law Office of Victor D. Nieblas Pradis, Los Angeles, CA, for the petitioner-appellant., Cindy S. Ferrier (argued), United States Department of Justice, Appearances only by David W. Ogden, United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Kristen A. Chapman, United States Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, and John P. Moran, United States Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., for the respondents-appellees.
Fletcher, Nelson, McKeown.
Cited by 20 opinions | Published
ORDER
The opinion filed July 31, 2002, is amended as follows:
298 F.3d 824, 829, line 23 (second column, after “apple”):
Add the following footnote: ‘We do not confront here a claim of failure to exercise discretion or manifest injustice.”
With this amendment, a majority of the panel has voted to deny Petitioner Appellant’s petition for rehearing. Judge McKeown voted to grant the petition for rehearing. Judge B. Fletcher and Judge D.W. Nelson voted to deny the petition for rehearing.
The petition for rehearing is DENIED.