State
v.
Woodruff
v.
Woodruff
Jul 1, 1807.
2 Day 504
Samuel Woodhuff, Plaintiff in error ; The State ot Connecticut, Defendant in error., Daggett, and Gould, for the plaintiff in error., Huntington, (of Middletown,) for the defendant, in error,
and of very suspicious aspect. In this method
unanimously, the judgment was reversed, on the ground, that the qualification required by statute is the having a freehold estate actually rated in the common list at nine dollars ; and that the having such estate rateable in the list at that sum is not sufficient.