State v. Woodruff, 2 Day 504 (1807). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Woodruff, 2 Day 504 (1807). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Johns (conn, 1981-06-09)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Johns
Conn. · 1981 · confidence medium
State v. Woodruff, 2 Day 504, 507 [1807]; State v. Benham, 7 Conn. 414, 418 [1829]; State v. Garvey, 42 Conn. 232, 233 [1875].” 7 General Statutes § 53a-8 provides: “A person, acting with the mental state required for commission of an offense, who solicits, requests, commands, importunes or intentionally aids another person to engage in conduct which constitutes an offense shall be criminally liable for such conduct and may be prosecuted and punished as if he were the principal offender.” The court charged the jury on this statute.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Moeller (2×)
Conn. · 1979 · confidence medium
Our constitution, first, has no double jeopardy clause, and although we have indicated that the prohibition against double jeopardy is implicit in our common law; State v. Woodruff, 2 Day 504, 507 (1807); we have never held that, under the circumstances of this case, a state prosecution is barred.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State
v.
Woodruff
Jul 1, 1807.
2 Day 504
Samuel Woodhuff, Plaintiff in error ; The State ot Connecticut, Defendant in error., Daggett, and Gould, for the plaintiff in error., Huntington, (of Middletown,) for the defendant, in error,
Published
By the Court,

unanimously, the judgment was reversed, on the ground, that the qualification required by statute is the having a freehold estate actually rated in the common list at nine dollars ;■ and that the having such estate rateable in the list at that sum is not sufficient.