Codde v. Mahiat, 66 N.W. 1093 (Mich. 1896).

Codde v. Mahiat, 66 N.W. 1093 (Mich. 1896). Book View Copy Cite

CODDE
v.
MAHIAT

Michigan Supreme Court.

Apr 28, 1896.

66 N.W. 1093

109 Mich. 186

1896 Mich. LEXIS 824

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

Oscar M. Springer (H. H. Hatch, of counsel), for complainant., William Stacey, for defendant.

Grant, Hooker, Long, Montgomery, Moore.

Cited by 9 opinions | Published

Grant, J.

(after stating the facts). Gray v. Barton, 62 Mich. 186, rules this case. It is so nearly identical in its facts and circumstances with this that we deem any further statement or discussion unnecessary.

The decree is affirmed, with costs.

Montgomery,' Hooker, and Moore, JJ., concurred. Long, C. J., did not sit.