Vorlander v. Hokenson, 175 N.W. 995 (Minn. 1920).
Vorlander v. Hokenson, 175 N.W. 995 (Minn. 1920). Book View Copy Cite
Negative Treatment Disapproved 1 negative
CHRISTIAN VORLANDER AND OTHERS
v.
A. J. HOKENSON AND ANOTHER. A. J. HOKENSON
No. 21,625.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Jan 23, 1920.
175 N.W. 995
Thompson, Hessian & Fletcher, for appellant., Ricke & Hamrum, for respondent.
Cubiam.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
Pee Cubiam.

The facts bring this case within the rule stated and applied in State v. Houghton, 134 Minn. 226, 158 N. W. 1017, and State v. City of Minneapolis, 136 Minn. 479, 162 N. W. 477. No distinction in point of substance can be [*485] made between the facts there presented and those here before the court, and the decisions there rendered are followed and applied.

The order appealed from is therefore reversed.