Brandt v. United States, 333 U.S. 836 (1948).

Brandt v. United States, 333 U.S. 836 (1948). Book View Copy Cite

Brandt
v.
United States Brack v. United States Brandt v. United States Gebhardt v. United States Hoven v. United States Mrugowsky v. United States Sievers v. United States Fischer v. United States Genzken v. United States Handloser v. United States Rose v. United States Schroeder v. United States Becker-Freyseng v. United States and Beigelboeck v. United States

No. 286; No. 287; No. 288; No. 289; No. 290; No. 291; No. 292; No. 293; No. 294; No. 295; No. 296; No. 297; No. 298; No. 299.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb 16, 1948.

333 U.S. 836

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

Applications, Are, Black, Consideration, Hearing, Jurisdiction, Murphy, Question, Set, Should, That, Took.

Cited by 17 opinions | Published

Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus and prohibition denied.

Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Murphy and Mr. Justice Rutledge are of the opinion that the petitions should be set for hearing on the question of the jurisdiction of this Court. Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.