Doctorman v. Schroeder, 114 A. 810 (1921).
Doctorman v. Schroeder, 114 A. 810 (1921). Book View Copy Cite
Positive Treatment Approved 2 positive
Solomon Doctorman
v.
Walter L. Schroeder
Mr. Ilarry Cassman, for the appellants., Mr. Clarence L. Cole and Mr. Theodore W. 8chimpf, for the respondents.
Affirmance, Bergen, Black, Gardner, Heppeni, Ieimer, Iiee, Iyatzenbaci, Kalisoi, Minturn, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, White, Williams.
was unable to raise the $1
Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

[*682] For affirmance — The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoi-i, Black, Iyatzenbaci-i, White, Heppeni-ieimer, Williams, Gardner—12. For reversal—None.