LaMonte v. Mott, 116 A. 269 (1921).
Search
LaMonte v. Mott, 116 A. 269 (1921). Book View Copy Cite
George M. LaMonte, as commissioner, &c.
v.
Harvey Mott
Oct 18, 1921.
116 A. 269
Messrs. Collins & Corbin, for the complainant., Mr. Roger Hinds, for the defendants.
Affirmance, Bergen, Black, Gardner, Heppenheimer, Kalisoii, Katzenbaci, Minturn, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Trenchard, Williams.
not to.-b.e:-ti’-usted and that they continued
Per Curiam.

Tlie decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevens.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Kalisoii, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Williams — 8. For reversal — Parker, Minturn, Heppenheimer, Gardner — 4.