Exton v. Cent. R.R., 46 A. 1099 (N.J. 1899).

Exton v. Cent. R.R., 46 A. 1099 (N.J. 1899). Book View Copy Cite

JOSEPH H. EXTON AND FANNY P. EXTON, HIS WIFE, IN ERROR
v.
THE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, IN ERROR

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Jun 19, 1899.

46 A. 1099

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

For the plaintiffs in error, Paul A. Queen and PL. Burdett Herr., For the defendant in error, George H. Large.

Cited by 15 opinions | Published

Per Curiam.

The judgment in this ease is affirmed upon the opinion in the. Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Collins, Dixon, Garrison, Van Syckel, Adams, Bogert, Hendrickson, Nixon, Vredenburgh. 11.

For reversal — 'None.