green
Positive treatment
0
red
0
yellow
1
green
0
procedural
▼
Strongest signal: Cited as authority
(1938-08-31)
Sample citers
Cited as authority
In re the Estate of Cuddeback
"…em>Matter of Turner, 156 id. 68, 71; affd., 246 App. Div. 741), it being contended, however, that the shrinkage in value, as respresented by stock exc"
Syfertize v1: red = negative treatment, yellow = caution,
green = positive treatment, procedural = cert/review/rehearing denied
(no substantive interpretation). Flag is the strongest substantive
signal across all citers; counts show the breakdown.
Brown
v.
Brown
v.
Brown
Sep 15, 1849.
Grrebn.
GrREBN, J.,
said that it was proper and allowable for a clerk and master to append to his report extracts from the proof to justify and illustrate his account, and that he approved of their so doing ; but to copy depositions at large or to take them and incorporate them into an account, and to charge as for an account, was an abuse.
Nelsoit made the question whether the Court would allow for several accounts in the same case. GrREBN, J., said he thought the proper practice would be to disallow the clerk’s costs in cases where he totally misconceived an order of reference, and so took an account as to require it to be set aside in toto ; but where it was merely modified upon - exceptions, the costs would be allowed.