Boyle v. Zacharie, 31 U.S. 348 (1832).
Search
Boyle v. Zacharie, 31 U.S. 348 (1832). Book View Copy Cite
✓ Positive Treatment Adopted 5 positive ▼
Hugh Boyle, Plaintiff in Error
v.
Zacharie and Turner, Defendants in Error
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 1, 1832.
31 U.S. 348
Before this ease came on for argument, Mr Wirt, in behalf of the-, plaintiff (the original defendant),
Marshall.
Cited by 40 opinions  |  Published
Mr Chief Justice Marshall said.

The judges who were in the minority of the court upon the general question as to .the constitutionality of state-insolvent'laws, concurred in the opinion of Mr Justice Johnson in the case of Ogden v. Saunders. That opinion is therefore to be deemed the opinion, of the other-judges who. assented to that judgment. Whatever principles are established in that opinion, are to be considered no longer .openTor. controversy, but the settled, law of the court.