Thompson v. King, 23 F. Cas. 1056 (1836).
Search
Thompson v. King, 23 F. Cas. 1056 (1836). Book View Copy Cite
THOMPSON
v.
KING
Nov 15, 1836.
23 F. Cas. 1056
O. Cox, contra,, R. S. Coxe, in reply,
Amount, Assets, Auditor, Between, Come, Contra, Coxe, Cranch, Creditor, Estate, Found, House, Improvements, King, Lot, Morsell, Reply, Sales, Stopped, Thompson, Upon, Value.
and
CRANCH, Chief Judge,

was of opinion that Thompson could not now come in as a general creditor of King’s estate for the balance.

MORSELL, Circuit Judge, contra.

THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, being absent, -the case was continued to the next term, when upon further argument by the same counsel,

THE COURT (CRANCH, Chief Judge, contra), stopped R. S. Coxe in reply, and decided that Thompson could come in as a general creditor, upon the assets of George King’s estate, for the difference between the amount of sales of the house and lot, and. the amount -of the value of Thompson’s improvements as found by the auditor.