Hampton
v.
Rouse
v.
Rouse
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 18, 1872.
Mr. P. Phillips, in support of the motion ; Mr. W. W. Boyce, contra.
Cited by 10 opinions | Published
It has often been held that in a writ of error to a joint judgment against several, all must join; and that the omission of one or more, without such proceeding, is an irregularity for which the writ will be dismissed. † The motion in the present case must, therefore, be
Granted.
†
Williams v. Bank of the United States, 11 Wheaton, 414; Owings v. Kincannon, 7 Peters, 399; The Protector, 11 Wallace, 82.