Myers v. Ampex, Inc., 498 F.2d 1092 (5th Cir. 1974).
Search
Myers v. Ampex, Inc., 498 F.2d 1092 (5th Cir. 1974). Book View Copy Cite
Roger C. MYERS, d/b/a Romyco Stereo
v.
AMPEX, INC., DefendantsAppellees
No. 73-3510.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Aug 21, 1974.
498 F.2d 1092
Roger C. Myers, pro se., Stanley McMurry, Dallas, Tex., for Cap. Records. ', James W. Mehaffy, Beaumont, Tex., for Columbia., R. Daniel Settle, Fort Worth, Tex., for RCA., J. Hoke Peacock, II, Beaumont, Tex., for Harry Fox Agency, Inc., John F. Still, pro se., Joseph Bonner, Nowata, Okl., for other defendants-appellees.
Ainsworth, Brown, Thornberry.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to our remand,[1] the district court for the Eastern Disrict of Texas has examined Appellant’s complaint in his action before the district court for the Western District of Oklahoma. The district court for the Eastern District of Texas again concluded that Appellant’s claim was identical to that dismissed in the Western District of Oklahoma. We affirm, concluding that the doctrine of direct estoppel bars the claim.[2]

1

Myers v. Ampex, Inc., 491 F.2d 1103 (5th Cir. 1974).

2

See Estevez v. Nabers, 219 F.2d 321 (5th Cir. 1955); 9 Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil § 2373, at 238-39.