Rodriquez v. Union Carbide Corp., 735 F.2d 365 (9th Cir. 1984).
Rodriquez v. Union Carbide Corp., 735 F.2d 365 (9th Cir. 1984). Book View Copy Cite
Nelson RODRIQUEZ
v.
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, a corporation
Nos. 83-2553, 83-2709.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jun 15, 1984.
735 F.2d 365
Francis J. McTernan, Garry, Dreyfus & McTernan, Inc., San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant., Marcia Hoyt, Hoyt & Goforth, Walnut Creek, Cal., Kenneth Silbert, Beeson, Tayer, Kovach & Silbert, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees.
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in this action, finding it barred by the six-month statute of limitations set forth in DelCostello v. Teamsters, 462 U.S. 151, 103 S.Ct. 2281, 76 L.Ed.2d 476 (1983).

The action was removed to federal court in 1981. This court has previously held that DelCostello does not apply retroactively. Barina v. Gulf Trading and Transportation Co., 726 F.2d 560 (9th Cir.1984); [*366] McNaughton v. Dillingham Corp., 722 F.2d 1459 (9th Cir.1984); Edwards v. Teamsters Local 36, 719 F.2d 1036 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1599, 80 L.Ed.2d 130 (1984).

We reverse and remand for a determination on the merits.