Reborn Enter. Inc. v. Fine Child, Inc., 754 F.2d 1072 (2d Cir. 1985).
Search
Reborn Enter. Inc. v. Fine Child, Inc., 754 F.2d 1072 (2d Cir. 1985). Book View Copy Cite
REBORN ENTERPRISES, INC.
v.
FINE CHILD, INC., Andrews MacLaren, Inc., Andrews MacLaren, Ltd., Ben's For Kids, Inc., James Fine and Mark Wein
No. 652, Docket 84-7624.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Feb 15, 1985.
754 F.2d 1072
Allan J. Kirschner, New York City (Robinson, Perlman & Kirschner, P.C., Jay D. Lukowski, New York City, of Counsel), for plaintiff-appellant., Joseph C. Sullivan, New York City (Kane, Dalsimer, Kane, Sullivan & Kurucz, New York City, of Counsel), for defendants-appellees Andrews MacLaren, Inc. & Andrews MacLaren, Ltd., Sharon Blau, New York City (Cohn & Blau, Frederick H. Cohn, New York City, of Counsel), for defendants-appellees Ben’s for Kids, Inc. and Mark Wein., Robert C. Edmonds, New York City (Edmonds & Co., New York City, of Counsel), for defendants-appellees Fine Child, Inc. and James Fine.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

Reborn Enterprises, Inc. appeals from the grant of summary judgment by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Abraham D. Sofaer, J., dismissing appellant’s action against appellees Fine Child, Inc., Andrews MacLaren, Inc., Andrew MacLaren, Ltd., Ben’s for Kids, Inc., James Fine and Mark Wein. Appellant’s complaint alleged violations of federal and state antitrust laws and common law contractual rights. The district court dismissed appellant’s pendent state law claims without prejudice.

We affirm substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Sofaer in his opinion dated June 20, 1984, and reported at 590 F.Supp. 1423 (S.D.N.Y.1984).