Boston & Maine R.R. v. United States, 396 U.S. 27 (1969).
Boston & Maine R.R. v. United States, 396 U.S. 27 (1969). Book View Copy Cite
Positive Treatment Affirmed 1 positive
BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 343.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 10, 1969.
396 U.S. 27
Carl E. Newton and M. Lauck Walton for appellants in No. 343. Lee Johnson, Attorney General of Oregon, Richard W. Sabin, Assistant Attorney General, and Clarence A. H. Meyer, Attorney General of Nebraska, for appellants in No. 480. Howard J. Trienens, Martin M. Lucente, George L. Saunders, Jr., R. Ames, W. W. Dalton, K. A. Dobbins, J. H. Durkin, N. Melvin, T. A. Miller, A. B. Russ, Jr., R. D. Sickler, E. L. Van Dellen, R. W. Yost, and S. R. Brittingham, Jr., for appellants in No. 497., Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Howard E. Shapiro, Fritz R. Kahn, and Jerome Nelson for the United States et al. in all cases. Hugh B. Cox and William H. Allen for railroad appellees in all cases.
Cited by 20 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgments are affirmed.