State v. Steen, 2005 ND 199 (N.D. 2005).
State v. Steen, 2005 ND 199 (N.D. 2005). Book View Copy Cite
State
v.
Steen
20050216.
North Dakota Supreme Court.
Nov 29, 2005.
2005 ND 199
Per Curiam.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Randal R. Steen, pro se, North Dakota State Penitentiary, P.O. Box 5521, Bismarck, N.D. 58506-5521; submitted on brief.

Cynthia M. Feland, Assistant State's Attorney, 514 E. Thayer, Bismarck, N.D. 58501-4413; submitted on brief.

Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Randal Steen appeals from a trial court's order denying his motion for a new trial. Steen argues the trial court should have granted him a new trial because he is actually innocent of the charges for which he was convicted. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Steen's motion for a new trial. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner