green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Laurence G. Russell, William L. Hanna and Eddie D. Langwell, Plaintiffs v. National Mediation Board, the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company
Ct. 432, 24 L.Ed.2d 426 (1969); Teamsters v. BRAC, 402 F.2d 196 , 205 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 848 , 89 S.Ct. 135 , 21 L.Ed.2d 119 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
Willson v. Cagle
See Van Houten v. Ralls, 411 F.2d 940 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 962 , 90 S.Ct. 436 , 24 L.Ed.2d 426 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Dawson v. Cole
See United States v. Feaster , 410 F.2d 1354 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 396 U.S. 962 , 90 S.Ct. 427 , 24 L.Ed.2d 426 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Metier v. Cooper Transport Co., Inc.
See New Mexico State Game Commission v. Udall, 410 F.2d 1197, 1200 (10th Cir.) (“[I]nsofar as wild animals within a state are capable of ownership, they are owned by the state in its sovereign capacity for the benefit of its people, with the resulting right to regulate the taking thereof.”), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 961 , 90 S.Ct. 429 , 24 L.Ed.2d 426 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
McDonald v. United States
See Van Houten v. Rails, 411 F.2d 940 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 962 , 90 S.Ct. 436 , 24 L.Ed.2d 426 (1969); Noga v. United States, 411 F.2d 943 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 841 , 90 S.Ct. 104 , 24 L.Ed.2d 92 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Castro Convertible Corporation v. Julie Ann Castro
See Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen v. Seaboard Coast R.R., 413 F.2d 19 , 23-24 (CA5), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 963 , 90 S.Ct. 432 , 24 L.Ed.2d 426 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mandel v. United States Department of Health, Education & Welfare
See United States v. Feaster, 410 F.2d 1354 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 962 , 90 S.Ct. 427 , 24 L.Ed.2d 426 (1969), which comprehensively described three of the exceptions to the doctrine: (1) where there would be international repercussions resulting from the administrative proceedings, citing McCulloch v. Sociedad Nacional de Marineros de Honduras, 372 U.S. 10 , 83 S.Ct. 671 , 9 L.Ed.2d 547 (1963); (2) where a substantial violation to a plaintiffs constitutional rights has been shown, citing, Fay v. Douds, 172 F.2d 720 (2nd Cir. 1949); and, (3) where an agency acted in “brazen” de…
discussed
Cited "see"
Afton Alps, Inc. v. United States
See, New Mexico State Game Comm’n v. Udall, 410 F.2d 1197, 1199 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 961 , 90 S.Ct. 429 , 24 L.Ed.2d 426 (1969); Coalition for United Community Action v. Romney, 316 F.Supp. 742, 746 (N.D.Ill.1970); Dugan v. Rank, supra 372 U.S. at 621-622 , 83 S.Ct. 999 , 10 L.Ed.2d 15 (dictum); Malone v. Bowdoin, 369 U.S. 643, 647 , 82 S.Ct. 980 , 8 L.Ed.2d 168 (1962) (dictum); Larson v. Domestic & Foreign Commerce Corp., supra 337 U.S. at 689-690 , 69 S.Ct. 1457 , 93 L.Ed. 1628 (dictum).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Railway Labor Executives' Association v. National Mediation Board
Carmen, 676 F.2d 960 , 962 (3d Cir.) ("judicial review of NMB decisions concerning its own jurisdictional authority is not barred"), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 989 , 103 S.Ct. 343 , 74 L.Ed.2d 384 (1982); International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. North Carolina Ports Auth., 463 F.2d 1, 3 (4th Cir.) (issue in Switchmen's "was not one of jurisdiction, but of the validity of a Board ruling on a substantial subject clearly within its authorized field"), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 982 , 93 S.Ct. 318 , 34 L.Ed.2d 245 (1972); see also United States v. Feaster, 410 F.2d 1354, 1361-62 (5th Cir.) (suggesting that j…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. National Mediation Board
Carmen, 676 F.2d 960 , 962 (3d Cir.) (“judicial review of NMB decisions concerning its own jurisdictional authority is not barred”), cert. denied 459 U.S. 989 , 103 S.Ct. 343 , 74 L.Ed.2d 384 (1982); International Longshoremen’s Ass’n v. North Carolina Ports Auth., 463 F.2d 1, 3 (4th Cir.) (issue in Switchmen’s “was not one of jurisdiction, but of the validity of a Board ruling on a substantial subject clearly within its authorized field”), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 982 , 93 S.Ct. 318 , 34 L.Ed.2d 245 (1972); see also United States v. Feaster, 410 F.2d 1354, 1361-62 (5th Cir.) (sugg…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United Air Lines, Inc. v. Airline Division
Compare United States v. Feaster, 410 F.2d 1354 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 962 , 90 S.Ct. 427 , 24 L.Ed.2d 426 (1969), with British Airways Board v. National Mediation Board, 685 F.2d 52 (2d Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United Air Lines, Inc. v. Airline Division, International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Compare United States v. Feaster, 410 F.2d 1354 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 962 , 90 S.Ct. 427 , 24 L.Ed.2d 426 (1969), with British Airways Board v. National Mediation Board, 685 F.2d 52 (2d Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio v. National Mediation Board
See, e.g., United States v. Feaster, 410 F.2d 1354 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 962 , 90 S.Ct. 427 , 24 L.Ed.2d 426 (1969): 25 The Mediation Board, as noted earlier in the opinion, found that the Terminal Railroad was concededly a "carrier" and that the State of Alabama controlled both the Docks Department and the Terminal Railroad.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. National Mediation Board
See, e.g., United States v. Feaster, 410 F.2d 1354 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 962 , 90 S.Ct. 427 , 24 L.Ed.2d 426 (1969): The Mediation Board, as noted earlier in the opinion, found that the Terminal Railroad was concededly a “carrier” and that the State of Alabama controlled both the Docks Department and the Terminal Railroad.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Mediation Board v. Continental Airlines Corp. (In Re Continental Airlines Corp.)
See also U.S. v. Feaster, 410 F.2d 1354, 1359 (5th Cir.) cert. denied 396 U.S. 962 , 90 S.Ct. 427 , 24 L.Ed.2d 426 (1969) (recognizing the RLA’s “statutory command to attain a prompt and orderly settlement of labor disputes" through NMB representational proceedings); Delpro, 509 F.Supp. at 472, 474 . 21 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jacqueline and Salvadore A. Dipippa v. United States
See, e.g., Van Houten v. Ralls, 411 F.2d 940, 943 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 962 , 90 S.Ct. 436 , 24 L.Ed.2d 426 (1969); Noga v. United States, 411 F.2d 943, 944 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 841 , 90 S.Ct. 104 , 24 L.Ed.2d 92 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
AGB Oil Co. v. CRYSTAL EXPLORATION, ETC.
See Castro Convertible Corporation v. Castro, 596 F.2d 123 , aff'd on rehearing, 600 F.2d 545 (5th Cir.1979) (motion to intervene); see also Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Engineermen v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co., 413 F.2d 19 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 963 , 90 S.Ct. 432 , 24 L.Ed.2d 426 (1969); Hann v. Carson, 462 F. Supp. 854 (M.D.Fla. 1978); Volkswagen Insurance Company v. Taylor, 201 So.2d 624 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967) (motions for summary judgment); Malicoat v. LaChappelle, 390 So.2d 481 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980) (order denying motion to set aside default judgment is res judicat…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. State of Mich.
See also Byran Itasca County, 426 U.S. 373 , 96 S.Ct. 2102 , 48 L.Ed.2d 710 (1976), where the Supreme Court construed a federal statute authorizing states, under certain circumstances, to assume civil and criminal jurisdiction over reservation Indians so as not to include state or local taxing authority to affect Indian lands or Indian income derived from activities within reservations. [27] Geer v. Connecticut, 161 U.S. 519 , 16 S.Ct. 600 , 40 L.Ed. 793 (1896). [28] Cf. New Mexico State Game Com'n v. Udall, 410 F.2d 1197 (10th Cir. 1969), cert. denied sub nom., New Mexico State Game Com'n v. …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Feaster, Director, Department of Docks of Alabama
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 558.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 8, 1969.
396 U.S. 962
1969 U.S. LEXIS 3227
MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, and Willis C. Darby, Jr., for petitioners. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Ruckelshaus, and Robert V. Zener for the United States et al. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General of Georgia, Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Courtney Stanton, Assistant Attorney General, for Georgia Ports Authority, and Robert Morgan, Attorney General of North Carolina, Ralph Moody, Deputy Attorney General, and Bernard A. Harrell, Assistant Attorney General, for North Carolina Ports Authority, as amici curiae in support of the petition.
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 75 opinions | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.