Reynolds v. United States, 523 U.S. 1088 (1998). · Go Syfert
Reynolds v. United States, 523 U.S. 1088 (1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
35 citation events (29 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Loleta Allen-Brown (ca11, 2001-03-27) · Strongest negative: United States v. Jacob Plitman (ca2, 1999-09-30)
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "but see" United States v. Jacob Plitman
2d Cir. · 1999 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Clemmons v. Delo, 124 F.3d 944, 956 (8th Cir.1997) (stating that “the law seems to be clear that the right of confrontation is personal and fundamental and cannot be waived by counsel”), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1088 , 118 S.Ct. 1548 , 140 L.Ed.2d 695 (1998).
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Loleta Allen-Brown
11th Cir. · 2001 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
issues of constitutional law and statutory interpretation are subject to plenary review.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Loleta Allen-Brown
11th Cir. · 2001 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
issues of constitutional law and statutory interpretation are subject to plenary review.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Loleta Allen-Brown
11th Cir. · 2001 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
issues of constitutional law and statutory interpretation are subject to plenary review.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Williams (2×)
4th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Clemmons v. Delo, 124 F.3d 944, 956 (8th Cir.1997) ("the law seems to be clear that the right of confrontation is personal and fundamental and cannot be waived by counsel"), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1088 , 118 S.Ct. 1548 , 140 L.Ed.2d 695 (1998); Carter v. Sowders, 5 F.3d 975, 981 (6th Cir.1993) ("there must be evidence in the record to support" a defendant's waiver of a Sixth Amendment right to confrontation for it to be valid).
cited Cited "see" Richard Hale Austin v. State of Tennessee
Tenn. Crim. App. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Austin v. Bell, 126 F.3d 843 (6th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S. Ct. 1526 and 523 U.S. 1088 , 118 S. Ct. 1547 (1998).
discussed Cited "see" Maurice A. Mason v. Betty Mitchell (2×)
6th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Austin v. Bell, 126 F.3d 843, 848 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 677 and 523 U.S. 1088 , 118 S.Ct. 1547 , 140 L.Ed.2d 695 (1998); cf. Scott v. Mitchell, 209 F.3d 854, 881 (6th Cir.) ("Without effective research into the available mitigating testimony, of course, it would be impossible for the lawyers to have made an informed decision either way."), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1021 , 121 S.Ct. 588 , 148 L.Ed.2d 503 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Austin (2×)
Tenn. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Austin v. Bell, 126 F.3d 843 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 677 and 523 U.S. 1088 , 118 S.Ct. 1547 , 140 L.Ed.2d 695 (1998).
cited Cited "see" State of Tennessee v. Richard Hale Austin
Tenn. Crim. App. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Austin v. Bell, 126 F.3d 843 (6th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S. Ct. 1526 and 523 U.S. 1088 , 118 S. Ct. 1547 (1998).
cited Cited "see" Sherman White v. James Helling, Acting Warden, Iowa State Penitentiary
8th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Clemmons v. Delo, 100 F.3d 1394, 1403 (8th Cir.1996), vacated on rehearing, 124 F.3d 944, 951 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1088 , 118 S.Ct. 1548 , 140 L.Ed.2d 695 (1998). 5 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hodge v. Commonwealth (2×)
Ky. · 2002 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Austin v. Bell, 126 F.3d 843, 849 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 677 (1998), and cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1088 , 118 S.Ct. 1547 , 140 L.Ed.2d 695 (1998).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Rosario-Delgado
11th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Wicks, 132 F.3d 383, 386 (7th Cir.1997) (proceeding to analyze whether or not defendant’s prior convictions met subsection (i) after noting that they did not meet subsection (ii) because they carried a maximum penalty of seven years), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1088 , 118 S.Ct. 1546 , 140 L.Ed.2d 694 (1998); Farmer, 73 F.3d at 842 (rejecting defendant’s claim that his prior convictions did not fall within subsection (i) “because we think it clear that Hobbs Act robbery qualifies as a serious violent felony under subparagraph (ii)”).
Reynolds
v.
United States
No. 97-8381.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 20, 1998.
523 U.S. 1088

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.