green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
11.7 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases ·
…issues of constitutional law and statutory interpretation are subject to plenary review.
Topic ↗
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Jacob Plitman
But see Clemmons v. Delo, 124 F.3d 944, 956 (8th Cir.1997) (stating that “the law seems to be clear that the right of confrontation is personal and fundamental and cannot be waived by counsel”), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1088 , 118 S.Ct. 1548 , 140 L.Ed.2d 695 (1998).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Loleta Allen-Brown
issues of constitutional law and statutory interpretation are subject to plenary review.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Loleta Allen-Brown
issues of constitutional law and statutory interpretation are subject to plenary review.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Loleta Allen-Brown
issues of constitutional law and statutory interpretation are subject to plenary review.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Williams
(2×)
See Clemmons v. Delo, 124 F.3d 944, 956 (8th Cir.1997) ("the law seems to be clear that the right of confrontation is personal and fundamental and cannot be waived by counsel"), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1088 , 118 S.Ct. 1548 , 140 L.Ed.2d 695 (1998); Carter v. Sowders, 5 F.3d 975, 981 (6th Cir.1993) ("there must be evidence in the record to support" a defendant's waiver of a Sixth Amendment right to confrontation for it to be valid).
cited
Cited "see"
Richard Hale Austin v. State of Tennessee
See Austin v. Bell, 126 F.3d 843 (6th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S. Ct. 1526 and 523 U.S. 1088 , 118 S. Ct. 1547 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Maurice A. Mason v. Betty Mitchell
(2×)
See Austin v. Bell, 126 F.3d 843, 848 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 677 and 523 U.S. 1088 , 118 S.Ct. 1547 , 140 L.Ed.2d 695 (1998); cf. Scott v. Mitchell, 209 F.3d 854, 881 (6th Cir.) ("Without effective research into the available mitigating testimony, of course, it would be impossible for the lawyers to have made an informed decision either way."), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1021 , 121 S.Ct. 588 , 148 L.Ed.2d 503 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Austin
(2×)
See Austin v. Bell, 126 F.3d 843 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 677 and 523 U.S. 1088 , 118 S.Ct. 1547 , 140 L.Ed.2d 695 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
State of Tennessee v. Richard Hale Austin
See Austin v. Bell, 126 F.3d 843 (6th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S. Ct. 1526 and 523 U.S. 1088 , 118 S. Ct. 1547 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Sherman White v. James Helling, Acting Warden, Iowa State Penitentiary
See Clemmons v. Delo, 100 F.3d 1394, 1403 (8th Cir.1996), vacated on rehearing, 124 F.3d 944, 951 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1088 , 118 S.Ct. 1548 , 140 L.Ed.2d 695 (1998). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hodge v. Commonwealth
(2×)
See, e.g., Austin v. Bell, 126 F.3d 843, 849 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 677 (1998), and cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1088 , 118 S.Ct. 1547 , 140 L.Ed.2d 695 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rosario-Delgado
See, e.g., United States v. Wicks, 132 F.3d 383, 386 (7th Cir.1997) (proceeding to analyze whether or not defendant’s prior convictions met subsection (i) after noting that they did not meet subsection (ii) because they carried a maximum penalty of seven years), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1088 , 118 S.Ct. 1546 , 140 L.Ed.2d 694 (1998); Farmer, 73 F.3d at 842 (rejecting defendant’s claim that his prior convictions did not fall within subsection (i) “because we think it clear that Hobbs Act robbery qualifies as a serious violent felony under subparagraph (ii)”).
Reynolds
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 97-8381.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 20, 1998.
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (3)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.