Hancock v. Holbrook, 119 U.S. 586 (1887).
Hancock v. Holbrook, 119 U.S. 586 (1887). Book View Copy Cite
Hancock
v.
Holbrook
1094.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 10, 1887.
119 U.S. 586
Mr. J. D. Bouse and Mr. William Grcmt for appellant:, Mr. Thomas J-. Semmes and Mr. Robert Mott for appellees.'
Waite.
Cited by 12 opinions  |  Published
. Me. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

The order remanding this ease is affirmed. A suit cannot be removed from a State Court to a Circuit Court of the United States under subsection 3 of .§ 639 of the Kevised Stat-' utes on the ground, pf “ prejudice or local influence,” unless ¿11 the plaintiffs or all the defendants are citizens of the state in which the suit was brought, and of a state other than thát of which those petitioning for the removal are citizens. Here -it appears that Hancock, the'plaintiff, oh whose petition the removal was had, is a citizen of New York,- and Eliza Jane' Holbrook and G-eorge' Nicholson,.two ,of the defendants, and those principally.interested.in-the.litigation, citizens of'Missis,-sippi, while R1W. Holbrook and Richard Fitzgerald, the other defendants, are alone citizens of Louisiana, where the suit y/as brought. These Louisiana defendants are necessary partiés to' the.suit, but, according to-the record, those who are citizens of Mississippi are- the real parties in interest. Affirmed.