Baker v. Spectrum (M.D. Fla. 2020).
Baker v. Spectrum (M.D. Fla. 2020). Book View Copy Cite
Baker
v.
Spectrum
6:20-cv-01522.
District Court, M.D. Florida.
Oct 26, 2020.
Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

TONEA BAKER, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 6:20-cv-1522-Orl-37LRH

SPECTRUM, Defendant.

ORDER Plaintiff moved to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 2 (“IFP Motion”).) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman recommends denying the IFP Motion and dismissing Plaintiff’s complaint (Doc. 1) without prejudice for failing to allege subject matter jurisdiction. (Doc. 8 (“R&R”).) Plaintiff did not object to the R&R, and the time for doing so has now passed. So the Court has examined the R&R only for clear error. See Wiand v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 8:12-cv-557-T-27EAJ, 2016 WL 355490, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Jan 28, 2016); see also Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. U.S. Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 8) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of this Order. 2. Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) is DENIED. -1- 3. Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 4. By Monday, November 9, 2020 Plaintiff may file an amended complaint that addresses the deficiencies identified in the R&R (Doc. 8). Failure to do so may result in the closure of this action without further notice. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on October 26, 2020.

4 vf lf bare) | Miah “ROY B. DALTON JR’ United States District Judge

Copies to: Pro Se Party

-2-