Lewis v. State, 101 S.E. 793 (Ga. 1920). · Go Syfert
Search
Lewis v. State, 101 S.E. 793 (Ga. 1920). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Darnell v. Tate (ga, 1951-04-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1921 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1921 1973 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
cited Cited "see" Darnell v. Tate
Ga. · 1951 · signal: see · confidence high
See Clay v. Clay, 149 Ga. 725 ( 101 S. E. 793 ); Palmer v. Neely, 162 Ga. 767 (5) ( 135 S. E. 90 ).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Kittles v. Bolton
Ga. Ct. App. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Clay v. Clay, 149 Ga. 725 ( 101 SE 793 ); Moore v. Turner, 148 Ga. 77 ( 95 SE 965 ).
Lewis
v.
State
No. 1598.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Jan 16, 1920.
101 S.E. 793
W. I. Geer, for plaintiff in error., Clifford Walker, attorney-general, B. T. Castellow, solicitor-general, R. R. Arnold, and M. C. Bennet, contra.
Gilbert.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Gilbert, J.

1. The verdict is supported by evidence. The sole special ground of the motion for new trial complains of a ruling by the court excluding certain evidence offered for the purpose of impeaching a witness for the State, but the ground fails to disclose any statement made by the witness of which the evidence offered for impeachment would have been contradictory, and is therefore incomplete.

(a) The evidence referred to was offered solely for impeachment, and counsel for plaintiff in error, in substance, so stated to the court. It was not offered as a part of the res gestae, and this court does not pass upon the question as to whether it was admissible as such.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.