green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.7 score
“or purposes of analysis under doyle, even if a defendant has made statements to the police after receiving miranda warnings, he is deemed to have maintained his silence, unless the post-arrest statements are inconsistent with the defendant's testimony at trial.”
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 37 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jessie Pillette v. Mary Berghuis
or purposes of analysis under doyle, even if a defendant has made statements to the police after receiving miranda warnings, he is deemed to have maintained his silence, unless the post-arrest statements are inconsistent with the defendant's testimony at trial.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Dean Harvey Hicks
Id. 495 U.S. at 418 , 110 S.Ct. at 1983 (emphasis in original).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Borkoski
See United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1156 (2d Cir.1989) (noting that in conspiracy case, jury must often piece together circumstantial evidence, and that “[e]ircumstantial evidence .. .if relied upon by the jury, is of no lesser probative value than direct evidence.”), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ricardo Morales, AKA \Ichi
See United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1153 (2d Cir.1989) (discussing spillover across defendants), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990), 495 U.S. 933 , 110 S.Ct. 2175 , 109 L.Ed.2d 504 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Millar
See United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1156 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Millar
See United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1156 (2d Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Bingham v. Zolt
See United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1151 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Bingham v. Zolt
See United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1151 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward F. McDonough Jr.
See United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1154 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Darryl Whiting, A/K/A G., God, Rah, United States of America v. Sean Dixon, A/K/A Michael White, United States of America v. Renaldo Pledger, A/K/A Eugene Noble, United States of America v. Edwin Carmichael, A/K/A Freedom, United States of America v. William Bowie, A/K/A Cuda, Diamond, United States of America v. Steven Wadlington, A/K/A Mohammed, United States of America v. Kenneth Bartlett, A/K/A Cheyenne
See United States v. Machor, 879 F.2d 945, 956 (1st Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Whiting
See United States v. Machor, 879 F.2d 945, 956 (1st Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Lee Baker, AKA \Eddie\"
These factors "dramatically demonstrate[ ] that the jury was able, under the careful instructions of the Court, to understand and separate the evidence as to each defendant and to individually determine the issues presented." Kennedy, 564 F.2d at 1334-35 ; see Cuozzo, 962 F.2d at 950 . 14 Moreover, we note that, "[a]lthough the jury had to evaluate a tremendous amount of evidence, the nature of the evidence and the legal concepts involved in the case were not extraordinarily difficult to comprehend, as they might be, for example, in a complex anti-trust case involving abstruse economic theorie…
cited
Cited "see"
Jeffries v. Harleston
See United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1151 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Bingham v. Zolt
See United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1151 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert W. Miller
See United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1181 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990); United States v. Carbone, 739 F.2d 45, 46 (2d Cir.1984); Paradiso v. United States, 689 F.2d 28, 31 (2d Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1116 , 103 S.Ct. 752 , 74 L.Ed.2d 970 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Robert Ragosta
See United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1156 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Piedrahita
See United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1182 (2d Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990); United States v. Thibadeau, 671 F.2d 75, 77 (2d Cir.1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David A. Sturman (90-3147) Ralph L. Levine (90-3148) Reuben Sturman (90-3151) and Melvin Kaminsky (90-3750)
See United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1172-75 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Federico Giovanelli, Steven Maltese, and Carmine Gualtiere
(2×)
See United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1156 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990). 52 Second, the defendants argue that the jury's finding must be rejected because the collection of money due on a losing wager does not satisfy RICO's definition of "unlawful debt." They assert that to satisfy the definition the prosecution must demonstrate that "loans [were extended] to cover gambling losses in order to facilitate continued wagering" or that the collection was akin to a "visit by a mob strongarm to enforce an illegal gambling debt." The va…
cited
Cited "see"
Francesco Polizzi v. United States
See United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lorenzo Gonzalez, A/K/A \Tito
See United States v. Machor, 879 F.2d 945, 953 (1st Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990); see also United States v. Robles-Pantoja, 887 F.2d 1250, 1256-57 (5th Cir.1989); United States v. Adamo, 882 F.2d 1218, 1235 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Parodi, 703 F.2d 768, 773 (4th Cir.1983); United States v. Butera, 677 F.2d 1376, 1381 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1108 , 103 S.Ct. 735 , 74 L.Ed.2d 958 (1983); United States v. Perry, 643 F.2d 38, 53 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 835 , 102 S.Ct. 138 , 70 L.Ed.2d 115 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Shea
See United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141 (2d Cir.1989) (offering directions to district judges in that circuit), cert. denied , — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990); cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 2564 , 109 L.Ed.2d 746 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cervone
See United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1153 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990). 2.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cervone
See United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1153 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990). 2.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Ginsburg
See also United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1156 (2d Cir.1989) (“Circumstantial evidence, it should be noted, if relied upon by the jury, is of no lesser probative value than direct evidence.”), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. George Campbell, Also Known as Ramadan, Also Known as Roland Campbell
See, e.g., United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1185 (2d Cir.1989) (extradition decree requiring only that “the maximum period of imprisonment may not in any event exceed 30 years” not violated by judgment “sentencing the defendant] to prison for forty-five years but ordering] that he be released after thirty years” (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Harrell v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990); United States v. Salim, 855 F.2d 944 (2d Cir.1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gallego
See, e.g., United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1170 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Shonubi
Evolving Role, supra, at 82; see also United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1156 (2d Cir.1989) (when a finder of fact has “pieced[d] together circumstantial evidence,” a “reviewing court must view ... [the] evidence not in isolation but in conjunction”), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Roland Markeith Johnson, United States of America v. Steven Lamont Lewis
(2×)
In discussing the propriety of offering a limiting instruction to the jury to minimize possible prejudice, some courts have seemingly alluded to whether the summary chart should be formally admitted into evidence: "This danger [of prejudice to the defendant] has led to the requirement of 'guarding instructions' to the effect that the chart is not itself evidence but is only an aid in evaluating the evidence." Scales, 594 F.2d at 564 ; see also United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1151 (2d Cir.1989) (use of charts in complex trials appropriate "so long as the judge properly instructs the …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Enrique Reinaldo Rivera and Samuel Aponte-Vega
See, e.g., United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1189 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990); United States v. Tutino, 883 F.2d 1125, 1136 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1139 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Leonard
Even if, as Seyfert fears, Leonard and Brown testify that Seyfert was culpable, “[t]he mere fact that co-defendants seek to place the blame on each other is not the sort of antagonism that requires a severance.” United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324, 1346 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 991 , 111 S.Ct. 535 , 112 L.Ed.2d 545 (1990) (citation omitted); see also United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1154 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Manuel Antonio Ogando, Anastasio Pineda Ogando, Also Known as Anibal, Also Known as Matuti and Bienvenido Castillo
See, e.g., United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141 , 1151 & 1158 (2d Cir.1989) (affirming in relevant part Judge Leval’s submission to the jury of special interrogatories and government summation charts in complex RICO case), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990); United States v. Pungitore, 910 F.2d 1084 , 1136 & n. 74 (3d Cir.1990) (listing predicate offenses), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2009 , 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991); United States v. Palmeri, 630 F.2d 192, 203 (3d Cir.1980) (same), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 967 , 101 S.Ct. 1484 , 67 L.Ed.2d 616 (1981)…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Kiewert
The federal rule contains an identical provision, and “courts have interpreted the rule as implicitly imposing a similar requirement where the government uses the hearsay to inculpate [the defendant].” United States v. Seeley, 892 F.2d 1, 2 (1st Cir. 1989); see, e.g., United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1170 (2d Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 110 S. Ct. 1138 , 2175 (1990); United States v. Boyce, 849 F.2d 833, 836 (3d Cir. 1988); United States v. Harrell, 788 F.2d 1524, 1526 (11th Cir. 1986); United States v. Riley, 657 F.2d 1377, 1382-83 (8th Cir. 1981); United States v. Alvarez, 584 F.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gambino
The Supreme Court has recognized that “[jjoint trials play a vital role in the criminal justice system,” and that “[jjoint trials generally serve the interests of justice by avoiding the scandal and inequity of inconsistent verdicts.” Richardson v. Marsh, 481 U.S. 200, 209-10 , 107 S.Ct. 1702, 1708-09 , 95 L.Ed.2d 176 (1987) (Scalia, J.); see also United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1150 (2d Cir.1989) (“by and large, joinder promotes judicial efficiency”), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Person v. Meachum
The Court held that reversible error can occur when either “the Government makes a conscious and flagrant attempt to build its case out of inferences arising from use of the testimonial privilege,” id. at 186 , 83 S.Ct. at 1154-55 , or when, “in the circumstances of a given case, inferences from a witness’ refusal to answer added critical weight to the prosecution’s case in a form not subject to cross-examination, and this unfairly prejudiced the defendant,” id. at 187 , 83 S.Ct. at 1155 ; see also United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1186 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Neftali Perez v. Everett Jones, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, and Robert Abrams, Attorney General of the State of New York
See Rado v. Connecticut, 607 F.2d 572, 581 (2d Cir.1979) (citing Namet v. United States, 373 U.S. 179 , 83 S.Ct. 1151 , 10 L.Ed.2d 278 (1963)), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 920 , 100 S.Ct. 3009 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1112 (1980); see also United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1186 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jerry El
v.
Zimmerman
v.
Zimmerman
No. 89-5742.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 20, 1990.
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.